Five steps. Four are ours.
One is yours.
We read every tender so you don't.
Each morning we read every new public tender in your field across Europe, translate it, and pull out what matters: the buyer, the value, the deadline and the rules.
- Official notices from TED, the EU's tender journal
- Any language, summarised in plain English
- Tenders with too little time to win are dropped
We tell you which ones you can win.
Each tender is scored against your services, references, size and certificates, and against who usually wins in that market. You only see "Bid" when it is a real chance.
- A clear bid, watch or skip, with the reasons
- Gaps you could fix, like a missing certificate
- Honest no-bids save you the most time
We write the full bid, in the buyer's own order.
Every answer follows the buyer's award criteria and weights, written from your past bids, CVs and policies. Facts we don't have are marked for you, never guessed.
- Every claim traced to your own documents
- Word limits and section order respected
- Gaps highlighted for you to confirm
We score it like the evaluator will.
A separate review panel marks the draft against the buyer's scoring grid, points out where marks are lost, and the bid is revised before it reaches you.
- A predicted score for every criterion
- Specific fixes, not generic advice
- Revised until it is worth your signature
You check, sign and submit.
You get the finished bid, a checklist of every form and certificate, and the few facts only you can confirm. You submit it on the buyer's portal, under your name.
- Nothing goes to a buyer without you
- Every form and deadline on one list
- If you win, we share in it. If not, you learn why.
Digital accessibility: research and support
● BID · STRONG FIT2. Approach and delivery plan
Within the first 30 days we audit the ministry's 14 public-facing services against WCAG 2.2 AA and EN 301 549, and deliver a ranked list of fixes with effort estimates your 2025 audit report, so teams start with the changes that help the most users first.
Delivery runs in six two-week cycles, each ending with a progress report and a short demonstration your delivery policy. Our accessibility lead, [[YOU CONFIRM: name and certification]], has led three comparable public-sector audits, including [[YOU CONFIRM: reference project and year]].
Risks we have planned for: limited access to legacy systems (we start with a read-only audit) and shifting priorities (a monthly re-ranking agreed with your product owner).
Clear 30-day plan with named standards. Loses a mark: no measure of success for each cycle.
Roles are clear, but the lead's certification is not stated. Evaluators will mark this down.
Mirrors the ministry's own goals and cites its accessibility statement. Strong.
Generic. Add the local training places you offered in a previous bid.
